tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2420860529344694449.post8131634824363875570..comments2024-03-25T02:37:02.982-07:00Comments on Lin.ear th.inking: Announcing Proj4JDr JTShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02383381220154739793noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2420860529344694449.post-55984800995767807862011-01-12T11:50:34.041-08:002011-01-12T11:50:34.041-08:00@Farrukh,
I've been swamped with other projec...@Farrukh,<br /><br />I've been swamped with other projects, so I'm afraid I haven't been giving the license issue the attention it deserves. I'll try and make this a priority very soon.<br /><br />Going Maven sounds fine to me. Will it require a restructuring of the directory layout? Maybe the best way to proceed is for you to prototype the Mavenized codebase, and then share this via the Proj4J mailing list?Dr JTShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02383381220154739793noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2420860529344694449.post-16976222845411470972011-01-12T07:38:46.674-08:002011-01-12T07:38:46.674-08:00Martin, Thank you for this great project. I would ...Martin, Thank you for this great project. I would like to use it in my project and need to check if you have decided on the license issue. I hope that a liberal OS license like Apache is chosen soon as it will really help with broader adoption of, and wider contribution to, the project. Any updates?<br /><br />Also I would like to offer to mavenize the project to make building, releasing and consuming it much much easier. Here are some benefits:<br />http://farrukhnajmi.blogspot.com/2008/02/why-maven-rocks-in-beginning-there-was.html<br /><br />Please share your thoughts. Thanks.Farrukh Najmihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01079055770348116259noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2420860529344694449.post-54999405390408539082010-05-05T11:24:25.981-07:002010-05-05T11:24:25.981-07:00Er, no, haven't sorted out the licensing quest...Er, no, haven't sorted out the licensing question yet. Still high on the ToDo list!Dr JTShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02383381220154739793noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2420860529344694449.post-6881193712615827502010-04-28T06:42:55.246-07:002010-04-28T06:42:55.246-07:00Have you come to a conclusion under which license ...Have you come to a conclusion under which license you are going to release Proj4J?FObermaierhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17875465422410248485noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2420860529344694449.post-42643072440503686862010-02-10T14:16:04.519-08:002010-02-10T14:16:04.519-08:00The question of licensing for Proj4J is high on th...The question of licensing for Proj4J is high on the To-Do list. It will definitely be a liberal open source license. It probably makes most sense to continue with the original Apache license. <br /><br />Further comments on this are welcome.Dr JTShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02383381220154739793noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2420860529344694449.post-85083234592081056792010-02-10T12:16:49.691-08:002010-02-10T12:16:49.691-08:00Yes of course, I think I prefer Apache. Thanks. (w...Yes of course, I think I prefer Apache. Thanks. (was jørnv, now stario)stariohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10942725285087988273noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2420860529344694449.post-15467062498391152752010-02-10T12:02:07.137-08:002010-02-10T12:02:07.137-08:00Good question, jørnv. The original JHall Labs vers...Good question, jørnv. The original JHall Labs version is licensed under the Apache 2.0 license. So, that would be an option, or LGPL v3. We await the good doctor's clarification.Frank Hardistyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14922884629465515997noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2420860529344694449.post-16891517760854662682010-02-10T11:54:24.225-08:002010-02-10T11:54:24.225-08:00Is it LGPL license?Is it LGPL license?stariohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10942725285087988273noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2420860529344694449.post-43691088808579045482010-02-02T21:46:55.327-08:002010-02-02T21:46:55.327-08:00what can I say except: great! Now we need to think...what can I say except: great! Now we need to think about giving OpenJUMP support for projections - I guess.mentaerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06337822862621103715noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2420860529344694449.post-79442798681938588212010-02-01T09:40:08.059-08:002010-02-01T09:40:08.059-08:00Juan, Frank:
Thanks for the positive comments. I...Juan, Frank:<br /><br />Thanks for the positive comments. It's great to hear that there's a potential user community out there for Proj4J. It's a very wide library (ie lots of projections, etc), so the best way to improve its quality is to get lots of developer eyeballs looking at it!<br /><br />MartinDr JTShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02383381220154739793noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2420860529344694449.post-15549262280769214412010-02-01T06:31:12.153-08:002010-02-01T06:31:12.153-08:00Martin,
This is great, thanks for doing this and ...Martin,<br /><br />This is great, thanks for doing this and releasing it. I had done something similar myself on a smaller scale for the <a href="http://code.google.com/p/geoviz/" rel="nofollow">GeoViz Toolkit</a>, but I found the amount of dead code etc. rather daunting. And, thinking in radians always makes my head hurt. <br /><br />So, I will gladly move to using Proj4J, and I'll be sure to contribute tests and bug fixes for any bits I work on.<br /><br />I found <a href="http://www.jhlabs.com/" rel="nofollow">JHLabs</a> image processing, and the filters in particular, to be quite useful as well. Hooray for Jerry!<br /><br />regards,<br />-<a href="http://www.personal.psu.edu/fah109/" rel="nofollow">Frank Hardisty</a>Frank Hardistyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14922884629465515997noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2420860529344694449.post-37464180915346554562010-01-31T08:07:15.512-08:002010-01-31T08:07:15.512-08:00Thank you, Martin. This nice package is being used...Thank you, Martin. This nice package is being used in gvSIG Mobile to avoid JNI and gain portability. Thanks for the hint about transformations.<br /><br />Regards,<br />Juan LucasJuan Lucas Domínguez Rubiohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14156571162553918257noreply@blogger.com