Fiona takes one on the chin in the first round! But Sean recovers quickly, and makes a hit by pointing out that Fiona allows defining new functions right in the scripting language. This would be feasible in JEQL as well, by providing hooks to into JVM-based scripting languages. And it's also very easy to develop extensions as simple Java functions or classes.
Now, this is really just a schoolyard scuffle over a very simple use case for spatial scripting. What the fans really want to see is a face-off over a more complex task...
5 comments:
Martin -- that was actually the first time I had used JEQL. Knowing it wrapped all the PostGIS-ish goodness I had a hunch it would be trivial and was certainly correct.
Oh, and if this was simply an LOC fight, ogr2ogr can still take the cake at 1 (even if an uglier solution).
Cool.... be interested to hear more about your usage of JEQL
And good point about ogr2ogr - maybe post that to the gis.stackexchange thread?
How about 2 processing tasks, chained, for the next step in complexity? Something like my code in http://sgillies.net/blog/1126/more-learning-from-haskell.
Yes, that seems like the next step in complexity. I'll work something up for this specific task.
To stretch out a bit further, I have also worked up a task which involves joins and aggregation. I'll post on that as soon as it's done.
Post a Comment